Regulatory filings
AIFMD Annex IV, Form PF, CPO-PQR and PRIIPs workflows built on the same prepared fund data.
Use case
Regulatory, investor and internal reporting from one data foundation.
Managers are accountable for reporting that is produced from data they do not fully control, administrators, custodians, risk providers and internal systems each hold a piece. Datox consolidates that data once and reuses it across every reporting obligation.
Pain points
Accountable for data you did not produce
The manager signs the filing and faces the investor, but the underlying data comes from several providers with different conventions and delivery timetables. Reconciling that under deadline pressure is the recurring problem.
- Multiple administrators or custodians with inconsistent formats and classifications.
- The same fund described differently for different regimes and audiences.
- Late provider data compressing the review window.
- Investor and regulatory numbers prepared separately, then found to differ.
- Little visibility of provider data quality until something fails a check.
Workflows
What managers typically automate
Investor reporting
Factsheets, investor packs and capital account reporting produced on the recurring cycle.
Internal & risk reporting
Exposure, liquidity and performance reporting for internal committees and oversight functions.
Provider oversight
Automated reconciliation and quality checks against provider data as a control over outsourced functions.
Operating model
Prepare once, report many times
Instead of a separate data exercise for each obligation, Datox maintains one validated view of each fund and period, then applies the mapping and packaging required by each output.
What this changes
- Investor and regulatory figures reconcile by construction.
- A provider data issue is found once, not separately in each process.
- Adding a new obligation reuses existing connectivity and mappings.
- Oversight evidence is produced as a by-product of the workflow.